Next quarter
your first capacity trade-off, not in 18 months.
You are no longer the CIO who absorbs demand and takes the blame for delays. You are the one who keeps their commitments, because they knew how to say no at the right time. AirSaas makes visible what your teams can genuinely deliver: filter demand upstream, decide against real capacity, prove the benefits downstream.
Already adopted by 100+ CIOs of mid-market companies and large groups
Kiabi · Valrhona · Leroy Merlin
your first capacity trade-off, not in 18 months.
you send us your files, we deliver the portfolio.
if the ritual does not take, you walk away at no cost.
with informed trade-offs.
your teams will thank you.
teams aligned asynchronously.
Your teams are at 130% on paper. Everything slips, so no project is at fault, and nobody can say no with facts. Here is what that costs you, quarter after quarter.
Every quarter, whatever was not delivered rolls into the next one, without anyone deciding it. The portfolio carries an invisible debt that keeps growing, and your commitments lose all credibility.
How much of what was promised was actually delivered this quarter, by team? Without that number, you cannot know where things jam, nor defend your teams against business units that call them slow.
With no visible capacity, you absorb everything and you are held responsible for the delays. You carry alone a trade-off that should be collective.
The real cost is not the waste. It is everything your teams do not deliver, for want of a trade-off.
When real capacity is on the screen, saying yes to a project means showing what it displaces.
The nature of the conversation changes: it is no longer IT refusing, it is the portfolio forcing a choice. And in the ExCom, you no longer come to defend a budget: you present the return on a portfolio of investments.
Roland Bouchut, former CIO of the Adecco group, works alongside our large-account customers. 30 minutes as equals on how to make a credible capacity plan hold at your scale — no demo, no commitment.
AirSaas continuously tracks the indicators committees actually look at, and names the problem when they slip.
The real change for a CIO is not displaying a capacity figure, it is being able to present several scenarios to the ExCom.
Let us be clear about what the Quarter Plan does, and what it does not. It does not replace the detailed plan your managers keep over three or four weeks: that level of detail stays with them. What it brings is to focus the whole organization on a single question: what can we genuinely do within a quarter?
And that is where it helps budget building enormously. A plan holding across the year does not mean it actually holds: quarter by quarter, with holidays, peaks and dependencies, the reality is quite different. Quarterly capacity reveals those bottlenecks before they derail the budget. A team is a simple and key notion here: a group with homogeneous skills, that reports its capacity and gets deliverables assigned to it.
of the quarter's commitments kept after the ritual was put in place, against 60% before (typical finding).
of projects launched with verified capacity: no more commitments made without knowing whether the team can keep up.
fewer project meetings after four months: the data replaces the status committee.
IT absorbs every request and takes the blame as the bottleneck
Teams at 130% on paper, timelines drifting
Saying no without proof, so never saying no
Roadmap promises that slip
The requester makes the trade-off, facing the capacity wall
Net capacity by team and by quarter, visible to everyone
Saying no with facts: here is what this project displaces
A roadmap committed for the quarter, and kept
“For the first time, I can present several scenarios of what we can and cannot do. The ExCom decides live, on costed elements, instead of asking me for the impossible.”
CIO, mid-market services company
of the quarter's commitments kept, against 60% before the ritual
Full case studies on the customer stories page.
“The teams knew perfectly well they were overloaded. Thanks to the Quarter Plan, they could put a number on it.”
Sébastien LouyotIndustry
CommunicationsHeadcount
2,800“We narrowed the priority projects down considerably, to stand a chance of seeing them through.”
Laurent CittonIndustry
EnergyHeadcount
1,300“By connecting AirSaas and Asana, I get the best of each tool to steer, execute and account for our transformation.”
Aurore ButrotIndustry
ManufacturingHeadcount
1,000Rollout with a contracted method: configuration, projects and PMs on board, first review co-facilitated by our teams.
No user licences: everyone gets access to the tool, from the project manager to the ExCom. Stop a pointless project and your bill goes down.
If the ritual does not take, you walk away at no cost. We take the risk with you.
No, the connectors sync progress. Project managers spend a few minutes a week enriching what belongs to governance.
6 weeks, with a contracted method and a first co-facilitated review. Your first capacity trade-off happens next quarter.
By team and by quarter. That is the level at which decisions are made; detailed time tracking stays in your team tools.
A 30-minute demo on your own context. We show you the ritual, you judge.