ISO 27001Next quarter
your first capacity trade-off, not in 18 months.
Make portfolio trade-offs
like an investor.
Fund what matters, stop the rest.
You no longer put up with a portfolio nobody really steers. You are the leader who decides, on facts, what the organization starts and what it stops. Your project portfolio is your second-largest investment after payroll, and part of it goes into projects that will never land. AirSaas applies the discipline of an investment committee to it: filter the demand, decide against real capacity, prove the benefits.
Already adopted by 100+ CIOs of mid-market companies and large groups
Kiabi · Valrhona · Leroy Merlin
Visual coming soon · Product screenshot
The portfolio benefits view (promised vs realized benefits, in euros). The ExCom needs to see money, not Gantt charts. Realistic data: named projects, amounts in euros.
Painless setup
you send us your files, we deliver the portfolio.
Free exit at 3 months
if the ritual does not take, you walk away at no cost.
1/3
more projects delivered
15%
of capacity recovered
80%
fewer meetings
A steering hub that gives executive and management committees the right level of visibility.
Making alignment between the business, IT and executive management real.
A new way of bringing teams on board.
Strategic steering with AirSaas, execution with Asana.
How many strategic projects have you been unable to deliver, for lack of capacity?
If the answer is none, it is not because all your projects are good. It is because no forum has, at the same time, the mandate, the cadence and the facts to decide. The budget voted in December is out of date by March; after that nobody says no any more, and 10 to 15% of your investment goes into projects everyone knows are doomed.
on €30M of project investment, that is €3M to €4.5M a year.
A common foundation. Not one more reporting exercise that exasperates the teams.
Your organization is heterogeneous, and that is normal: heavily tooled product squads on one side, operational contributors with no project culture on the other. AirSaas fits both: we connect where the information already exists, we structure it where it does not.
Your tooled-up teams — we plug in, nothing changes for them.
The squads stay in Jira, Asana, Monday or Planner. Progress flows up into AirSaas on its own through the connectors. Nobody re-enters anything, nobody fills in a second tool.
Your teams with no tool — AirSaas becomes their single source of truth.
For contributors with no management tool, AirSaas is the bare minimum: the weather, the milestones, the attention points. A few minutes a week, not a monster to feed.
No investor would handle €30M like this.
Your project governance has:
1
one trade-off a year
2
projects that never stop
3
benefits never verified
4
slides
An investment committee has:
1
a quarterly review cadence
2
exit criteria
3
a measure of return
4
continuous reallocation of capital
AirSaas installs the discipline that is missing. Not another layer of tooling: a decision ritual.
Decide
Every 90 days, your entire portfolio is decided. And there is a record of it.
The quarterly trade-off session puts every project in front of three facts: the capacity it consumes, its real progress, the benefits it still promises.
The trade-off view: the whole portfolio on one screen, each project with its workload, its weather, its sponsor and its expected benefit. Nobody decides on slides that are three weeks old any more.
Decisions on the record: continue, stop, postpone. Every decision is dated, justified and kept in history. Your committees finally produce something that outlives the meeting.
Reallocation in the session: stop a project and the freed-up capacity appears immediately, ready to be reassigned to the priorities. The decision and its effect, in the same move.
The committed roadmap: what is decided becomes the commitment for the quarter, notified to the teams and answerable at the next committee.
Visual coming soon · Product screenshot
The trade-off session, one project moved to stopped, the capacity reallocated. Realistic data: named projects, amounts in euros.
Visual coming soon · Diagram / illustration
Two annual trajectories compared, then the budget vs actuals curve with the quarterly trade-off points.
Fund
Receive and defend a budget as costed options. Not a wish list.
Building the budget stops being a negotiation over line items and becomes a choice between compared futures.
Trajectories side by side: what happens if we launch program X, if we push back Y, if we hire 3 FTEs? Every scenario carries its workload, its cost and its expected benefits.
A living budget: the chosen scenario becomes the plan for the year, tracked quarter after quarter. The budget you voted is no longer a document, it is an activated scenario.
A visible landing point: at each Quarter Plan, the actuals against the plan. You find the gap in April, not in November.
Re-simulation during the year: reality shifts? You make the trade-off again with your eyes open, using the same tools you used at budget time.
Prove
What your investments actually returned.
The piece missing from every governance setup: verifying the benefit that was promised.
Declared at launch: every project states its benefit (savings, revenue, risk avoided), its indicator, its deadline and its owner. If one of the four is missing, it is not a benefit, it is a hope.
The post-delivery review: scheduled automatically at the deadline, in session. Promised against realized, with gaps documented and owned.
The benefits view: the whole portfolio read like an investor would read it, by department and by program. The argument that changes your ExCom: you stop debating opinions and start reading results.
The sincerity effect: when everyone knows the benefit will be verified, the business cases at the door become honest again. Measurement cleans up everything upstream.
Visual coming soon · Product screenshot
The benefits view, promised vs realized in euros. Realistic data: named projects, amounts in euros.
Visual coming soon · Product screenshot
An ExCom dashboard + a screenshot of the MCP conversation. Realistic data: named projects, amounts in euros.
See
The state of the portfolio, without asking anyone for a report.
The Flash Report: the portfolio summary generated in one click, sent automatically before each committee.
Built-in BI: real-time dashboards, filterable by department, available read-only to the whole ExCom.
A queryable portfolio: through the AirSaas MCP server, ask your questions in plain language from your AI assistant (which programs are slipping, and why?) and get sourced answers.
Three hours a quarter. That is all.
The ritual takes 3 hours of the decision-makers' time every 90 days. Your teams keep their tools. Your CIO or your transformation department runs it; we co-facilitate the first 3 cycles.
The numbers measured at our customers
15%
of your project budget goes every year into initiatives with no realized benefit (PMI, Gartner).
x4
on decision-making speed, as measured by our customers (verified reviews).
100+
companies make their portfolio trade-offs with AirSaas, from Kiabi to Valrhona.
Before / after the quarterly capacity trade-off
Without AirSaas
1
Committees that take note and postpone the decision
2
Defending a budget with slides
3
One trade-off a year, out of date by March
4
Numbers disputed in the room
With AirSaas
1
Every 90 days the entire portfolio is decided, and there is a record of it
2
Presenting a return, with realized benefits
3
Continuous reallocation of project capital, like an investment committee
4
Living, sourced data — the same for everyone
KIABIVALRHONALEROY MERLINCHIESIINTUISGT SOLUTIONS
“In the ExCom we used to decide on instinct and on whoever spoke loudest. Now we decide on facts: what each project returns, what it costs in capacity. We stop projects without guilt, and we reinvest.”
CEO, retail group
+30%
more strategic projects delivered on the same budget in the first year
They make their portfolio trade-offs with AirSaas
Full case studies on the customer stories page.
“It is not a tool. It is an approach, a discipline, a practice.”
SCSébastien Chailley
Industry
Eyewear, retailHeadcount
3,000“It was still about trust, but trust with a process behind it.”
Chantal GuilmainIndustry
RetailHeadcount
2,500“We can pass the ball back to the business, so that it owns the prioritization, based on our real capacity to deliver.”
Émilie LecartIndustry
HospitalityHeadcount
4,000Your first capacity trade-off happens next quarter. Not in 18 months.
6 weeks
Rollout with a contracted method: configuration, projects and PMs on board, first review co-facilitated by our teams.
€60 / month / active project
No user licences: everyone gets access to the tool, from the project manager to the ExCom. Stop a pointless project and your bill goes down.
Go/NoGo at 3 months
If the ritual does not take, you walk away at no cost. We take the risk with you.
Frequently asked questions
No. Project managers spend a few minutes a week in it, decision-makers 3 hours a quarter. AirSaas does not replace team tools (Jira, Asana, Monday): it connects to them and governs above them.
Your CIO or your transformation department. We co-facilitate the first three cycles, until you are autonomous.
From the reference studies on portfolio waste (PMI, Gartner) and from what our customers find at their first trade-off session.
A Go/NoGo clause at 3 months: if the ritual does not settle in, you walk away at no cost.
See what AirSaas would change for your portfolio.
A 30-minute demo on your own context. We show you the ritual, you judge.